Tip #38: Finding Unpublished Research Results in ClinicalTrials.gov

By

Many thanks to Erica Lake (Outreach Coordinator, NNLM Region 6), and Jimithy Hawkins and Allison Yu from the ClinicalTrials.gov product management team for sharing their expertise and time.

ClinicalTrials.gov outlines how to find studies with results published in a medical journals. However, no details are provided on how to find studies with unpublished research results. 

Never fear! It is possible to perform this search on both the classic and beta ClinicalTrials.gov websites.

Classic ClinicalTrials.gov

1. Navigate to the Find a study search box on the homepage.

2. In the Other terms search field, enter the following search string as shown:

AREA[ResultsFirstSubmitDate] NOT MISSING AND NOT AREA[ReferenceType] EXPAND[Concept] "Result"

3. Click the Search button.


This search will retrieve all trials that have results posted but do not have any publications relating to those results.

Some studies may include other types of publications, such as those related to the study background or protocol, but they will not include any publications indicated by the data submitter as relating to results.

Beta ClinicalTrials.gov

1. Navigate to the Search box on the homepage.

2. Click on the Advance Filters box and select the Study Results filter.

 

 

 



3. Select With Results under the Study Results filter. In the Other terms field, enter the following search string as shown:

 

AREA[ReferenceType]NOT RESULT

 

 


 

4. Click the Search button.

The search will retrieve all trials that have results posted but do not have any publications relating to those results.

As in the classic version, some studies may include other types of publications, such as those related to the study background or protocol, but they will not include any publications indicated by the data submitter as relating to results.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tip #1: Bulk export from Google Scholar

By
Image
This post was updated on October 10, 2022 with new instructions for #3 under "For EndNote users..." For years, I kept hearing from colleagues that I should be searching Google Scholar as part of my systematic review projects. I didn't, for 3 reasons: I didn't know GS' search syntax GS notoriously does not allow bulk export to reference managers I didn't have a sense of how many results I should export.   Last fall, I finally said enough was enough and it was time to learn how to wrangle this beast. It turns out that there is now a third-party tool that facilitates bulk export from Google Scholar, Harzing's Publish or Perish . Here's how you get started: Download PoP for free Paste your query into the Keywords field Set your maximum number of results. I follow the guidelines on p. 135 of Wichor Bramer's dissertation , which is a great handbook for expert searching. Bramer suggests the first 200 results, or 100 if you are getting low numbers of res
Read more

Tip #23: PubMed's [tiab] vs. [tw]

By
Image
Search field tags are a quick way to specify the exact fields you would like to search when using keywords. For example, I can tell PubMed to search for my term only in the title field or only in the MeSH Terms field. You can view a list of available search fields from the drop down menu in PubMed's Advanced Search Builder. Specifying field tags for keywords is also a good practice in PubMed because keywords searched without field tags will be translated through Automatic Term Mapping which may reduce the precision of your results. Here are a few sample searches in my search history, including #4 which wasn't limited to a field (notice how it was translated in the expanded search details): The fields that are included in the [title/abstract] fields are pretty self-explanatory (words and numbers included in a citation's title, collection title, abstract, other abstract and author keywords), but what is actually included in the [Text Word] (can also be searched as [tw]) fi
Read more

Tip #4: Ovid MEDLINE Adjacency and Field Tags

By
Image
This tip was submitted by Kathryn Vanderboll (University of Michigan):  In Ovid MEDLINE, using adjacency with .kw. does not work the way you (probably) want - use .kf. instead! While searching (surg* adj (educat* or instruct* or learn* or teach* or train*)).kw., our team couldn't figure out why our sentinel article tagged with with the author supplied keyword "surgical teaching" wasn't showing up. Through trial and error, we learned that .kw. adjacency only works between lines . That is, how close keywords are to each other on different lines. For example, (surg* adj teach*).kw. picks up articles with keyword headings like:  But does NOT pick up articles that might have keyword headings like:   To use adjacency searching within a single keyword heading, you'll need to use .kf. The Ovid help documentation notes : "The Keyword Heading (KW) field contains the Keyword Headings assigned by authors. Keyword Headings are the author keywords. To retrieve every Key
Read more